Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Review - Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.

[Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>]

On 10/06/2018 03:39 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 12:10 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 10/04/2018 10:27 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 08:24 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> I have been trying to follow various threads on this topic and
>>>> none of them address the review of this patch that went in. There
>>>> is no mistake in the title of this topic. I do consider this
>>>> topic to be more general than limited to Maintainer Summit.
>>>> Hence, the choice of a wider Technical designation.
>>>>
>>>> So I am kicking off a thread to do the review with my comments. I
>>>> am in general agreement with the spirit of this change to the
>>>> existing "Code of Conflict".
>>>
>>> Just as an FYI, the Zephyr project recently included the
>>> contributor covenant CoC minus the enforcement clause.  They did a
>>> standard github PR for this:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/10356
>>>
>>> They note that they may add more enforcement details when the
>>> community agrees on them.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the link. It is almost identical to the Code of Conduct
>> that went into Linux 4.19-rc4 minus the enforcement section.
>>
>> It would make sense to remove the enforcement section and discuss and
>> add enforcement after the usual patch review process we already have
>> in place.
>>
>> I personally would prefer amending the CoC in Linux 4.19 removing the
>> enforcement details over waiting to discuss at the Maintainer and/or
>> Kernel summit and releasing Linux 4.19 with the CoC v1 as it reads
>> now.
> 
> OK, I took this suggestion and posted it as a concrete patch set to see
> how it flies.
> 

Thanks for sending the patches.

-- Shuah