From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E220936AE6 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=perches.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from omf16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C98B140BB1; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2721F2000F; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:16:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <6737487f097401510c87f38239d2f75e22fca46d.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [workflows]RFC: switching "THE REST" in MAINTAINERS away from linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Joe Perches To: Mark Brown Cc: Steven Rostedt , Konstantin Ryabitsev , users@linux.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:16:15 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20231106-venomous-raccoon-of-wealth-acc57c@nitro> <20231106110547.6956a430@gandalf.local.home> <280f404dcaab5a1cee2cc67f829c1d85aa91d772.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Stat-Signature: zz3e1eyqinjy4u79fu7wbhdnrajq77mx X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2721F2000F X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX18xtHorsbjwCHykZbTtCXQYcwW3qKLEAuM= X-HE-Tag: 1699467376-409563 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX18Ppu+02Y79QRcAJTpX3eNPE6kjGvR/J7nIj5q3chUCygwUJaufmnoGSrEIXKOtfZX9hNLBTn5bDoiOBHIsx60Ghpj6shGpotzkXcxjilKdaawf9ltalPWq3WOE21WwKgVDhD8VPlRTfkLr7nDTqSIXhSjqdPBcYyu5vfz45UiXzqddVg/vSnjjF1G7kr9xqpQiOm1l/pfo1DwRr15s1+bzjrbvjvlIqEKVRyA5vq+MAEoYwDsGdXjQiDtMRsXHeTmWCP3ib1IwnRNOfv80WHOpktnbtdeZVJTl4q1Bd9TTVOMZ5qZrvo+Ra9AQntt2Ei4MfbR1kVe6unw+2YdTBQQ9CY81xbcOO0gfDubsQ11iXEN1VaBVP6QrlhWnFkJMxCua3SqB00hDCTgy1viesSn8b8rKacwvT7TsJC8ag1nv0brU5uxoonwv On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 16:44 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:19:46AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 11:05 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: >=20 > > > > For this reason, I propose switching the "F: *" entry in MAINTAINER= S=20 > > > > ("THE REST") to patches@lists.linux.dev instead. This list differs = from LKML > > > > in the following important aspects: >=20 > > > As long as it doesn't affect those that have L: linux-kernel@vger.ker= nel.org >=20 > > > All core kernel changes should still go there. >=20 > > > (Scheduler, timing, tracing, interrupts, etc) >=20 > > If this is done, perhaps half or more of the lkml > > mailing list entries in MAINTAINERS should be removed. >=20 > > This grep shows all the section entries with > > L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > most of which seem not "core". >=20 > The suggestion wasn't to use LKML exclusively for core changs but rather > to not have LKML added for everything that has a more specific list. Likely you and I read Steven's suggestion differently. Perhaps Steven wants to clarify.