From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84AA15A8 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 22:38:04 +0000 (UTC) To: Joe Perches , NeilBrown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel , Linus Torvalds References: <20181020134908.GA32218@kroah.com> <87y3ar80ac.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <62b70ccb-9484-7842-e57a-9697946636c3@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 15:37:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mishi Choudhary , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Call to Action Re: [PATCH 0/7] Code of Conduct: Fix some wording, and add an interpretation document List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10/21/18 3:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 08:20 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 20 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> As everyone knows by now, we added a new Code of Conduct to the kernel >>> tree a few weeks ago. >> >> I wanted to stay detached from all this, but as remaining (publicly) >> silent might be seen (publicly) as acquiescing, I hereby declare that: >> I reject, as illegitimate, this Code and the process by >> which it is being "developed". > [] >> I call on any other community members who reject this process to say so, >> not to remain silent. > > The concept of describing a desire for pleasant interactions > while > developing the linux kernel is legitimate and useful. Agree. > I do reject this process as well and I think the attempt to > reform it via a private, non-public method is, at best, > poor form. and Agree. > Joe Perches Thanks. -- ~Randy