ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Maintainer's Summit Agenda Planning
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 23:45:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f0baf06-4cf1-e4b6-890c-08ee8e7d4f9a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJYCRVr5DpRfVD0NNuJ0yzNTeKrDOo8u1tXeSw8GxjyBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/24/17 17:54, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 16:03 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:27 AM, James Bottomley
>>> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 15:20 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>>>> Appendix: Other topics that were brought up
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> Developing across multiple areas of the kernel
>>>>
>>>> I've got a couple of extra possibilities
>>>> [...]
>>>> 2) Trivial patches (again).
>>>
>>> Given that the "trivial patches" topic's discussion ended up boiling
>>> down to a discussion about developing across multiple areas of the
>>> kernel, maybe we should make space for a "tree-wide changes"
>>> discussion? Even after the earlier thread about it, I tripped all over
>>> this in the last couple months while doing timer conversions, so I
>>> would at least have some more strong opinions on the subject. ;)
>>
>> It's a ripe area (like months old limburger cheese) for discussion.
>>
>> There's currently no good way to do tree-wide changes.
> 
> Some things stand out for me:

< snip >

> 3) Maintainers (sanely) balk at getting a massive dump of patches all
> at once. It would be nice to document "batch limits" in the
> MAINTAINERS file too. (For example, davem asked me after I sent him 60
> patches in a single day if I could please limit the batch size to 12
> between commits (i.e. only send the next batch after the prior batch
> has been applied/processed). "H:"ow many at once, maybe?

< snip >

But patches sent to a list are not just for the maintainer.  They are
also for anyone else who may be affected or who may care to review
the patches.  Those other people have their own schedule issues.

If you hold off sending a second patch set this week, then send it
next week (when the maintainer once again has some bandwith), it is
likely that someone other than the maintainer has time to look at
that patche set this week, but may have no free time to do so next week.

-Frank

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-05 19:20 Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-05 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 21:55 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-06 14:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-10-06 15:27 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-06 16:26   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 16:32     ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-10-06 16:51       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 16:56       ` James Bottomley
2017-10-06 17:16         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 20:11       ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-09  8:13   ` Mark Brown
2017-10-09 15:54   ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-09 16:37     ` James Bottomley
2017-10-09 16:47       ` Joe Perches
2017-10-09 16:49       ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-09 16:56         ` James Bottomley
2017-10-09 17:04           ` Joe Perches
2017-10-11 18:51           ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-12 10:03             ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-16 14:12             ` James Bottomley
2017-10-16 14:25               ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-16 16:07                 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-17  8:34                   ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-18  1:27                     ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 10:41                       ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-16 18:52               ` Mark Brown
2017-10-10  8:53       ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-24 23:03   ` Kees Cook
2017-10-24 23:41     ` Joe Perches
2017-10-25  0:54       ` Kees Cook
2017-10-25  4:21         ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-25  4:29           ` Joe Perches
2017-10-25  4:36             ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-25  6:05         ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-25  6:55           ` Kees Cook
2017-10-25  7:34             ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-25  6:45         ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2017-10-25  7:56         ` Mark Brown
2017-10-25  9:39         ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-10-31 19:19         ` Rob Herring
2017-10-31 19:28           ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f0baf06-4cf1-e4b6-890c-08ee8e7d4f9a@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox