From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B89129CA for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net (bh-25.webhostbox.net [208.91.199.152]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6B01B2 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:52:34 +0000 (UTC) To: Zefan Li , Jiri Kosina , Takashi Iwai References: <5780334E.8020801@roeck-us.net> <20160709001046.GH28589@dtor-ws> <91774112.AKkGksYjl6@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160709004352.GK28589@dtor-ws> <1468058721.2557.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <57824E91.2030902@roeck-us.net> <5788AC92.3030008@huawei.com> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <5788EA9F.9050408@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:52:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5788AC92.3030008@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/15/2016 02:27 AM, Zefan Li wrote: > On 2016/7/10 21:33, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 07/10/2016 03:20 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: >>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> >>>> IMO, we need a really better QA before releasing stable trees. They are >>>> all fixes, yes, but they aren't always fixes for stable trees, in >>>> reality. >>> >>> I agree. >>> >>> BTW, how much coverage does -stable get from Fengguang's 0day robot? I >>> think that as most of the stable tress don't really use the git workflow, >>> the trees are being pushed out to git.kernel.org only shortly before >>> actual release, so the 0day bot doesn't have enough time to catch up; but >>> I have to admit I don't really know how exactly the timing and flow of >>> patches works here. >>> >> >> Greg tends to update his trees on a quite regular basis, as he applies patches. >> I don't really know for sure about the others, but overall my impression is >> that there tends to be a flurry of patches applied in the day before a stable >> release candidate is announced. >> > > I also set up a testing branch for 3.4.y so that Fengguang's 0day can test it > before I send out stable-rc1. > Is that at a well defined location ? I would prefer to pick up the changes from there instead of the quilt queue (and I am sure Kevin would like to do the same). Thanks, Guenter