From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969DA9C for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net (bh-25.webhostbox.net [208.91.199.152]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87EA6196 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 05:23:16 +0000 (UTC) To: Trond Myklebust , Dan Williams , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" References: <5780334E.8020801@roeck-us.net> <20160709001046.GH28589@dtor-ws> <91774112.AKkGksYjl6@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160709004352.GK28589@dtor-ws> <1468058721.2557.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <0ED98206-0A66-48A4-B5A4-A0BC53FDBF05@primarydata.com> <1468114447.2333.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1468115770.2333.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <718BE1FD-6169-4205-A905-53F997D5943A@primarydata.com> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <57832D3A.8080702@roeck-us.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:23:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <718BE1FD-6169-4205-A905-53F997D5943A@primarydata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] kernel unit testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/10/2016 09:03 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > So, we might as well make this a formal proposal. > > I’d like to propose that we have a discussion around how to make it easier to implement kernel unit tests. I’ve co-opted Dan as he has expressed both an interest and hands-on experience. :-) > Making it easier to implement such tests won't get such tests executed. I think we should also discuss how to implement more formal testing of release candidates, and/or how to improve test coverage. Thanks, Guenter