ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] ZONE_DEVICE and Persistent Memory (was: Re: Draft agenda for the kernel summit)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:49:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561FD92D.6010309@sr71.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4j44fE1BFFdRyLmaaF+CTJsMtaNC_=jN9+hqPCGGwXnsQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/14/2015 05:17 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> I am wondering if it would be productive / good use of time to do a
> direction check on the mm changes being done in support of large
> persistent memory devices.

I think there's probably an even wider discussion that we should have here.

Beyond just ZONE_DEVICE, the sheer number of memory types is increasing
fast, and our current solutions are, at best, inconsistent. We currently
handle memory types as new zones, repurposed zones, pageblocks inside
zones, or faux NUMA nodes.

Are our current solutions too erratic?
Do we need to solve these problems generally, or are we going to kill
ourselves trying to make everyone happy?
What types do we ignore today, but shouldn't?
What types are coming down the pike?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-15  0:17 Dan Williams
2015-10-15 16:49 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-10-16 21:08   ` Jerome Glisse
2015-10-19 18:29     ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-19 18:52       ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-19 19:23         ` Dan Williams
2015-10-19 19:32           ` Jerome Glisse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561FD92D.6010309@sr71.net \
    --to=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox