From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7C88B3D for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net (bh-25.webhostbox.net [208.91.199.152]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552BEFB for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <559C62D0.9090301@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:37:52 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski , Jiri Kosina References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] services needed from kernel.org infrastructure List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/07/2015 04:31 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: >> I think it'd be useful to have a session where maintainers could come up >> with feature / improvement requests for kernel.org infrastructure and have >> a subsequent discussion about whether they would be generally useful. >> >> Let me start with my personal wish: >> >> I personally would very welcome a facility that'd send out an e-mail if a >> new commit is pushed to a git.kernel.org repo branch (sort of what tip-bot >> and akpm's scripts are doing these days) to automatically notify the patch >> author that the patch has been merged and pushed out. >> >> Suggested attendance: Konstantin, maintainers :) > > I wouldn't mind something like patchwork for lkml. Since I use gmail > (sigh), it's a minor PITA to pull out patchbombs in git am-able > format. > What is wrong with https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/LKML/list/ ? Guenter