From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D25A7FE for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3535E1F986 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <538BE4DE.6050200@infradead.org> Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:43:42 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Bottomley , "John W. Linville" References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1401304315.13546.142.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <20140528191514.GE13255@tuxdriver.com> <20140530105938.62fd566d@gandalf.local.home> <20140530151026.GE24054@tuxdriver.com> <1401484253.2364.3.camel@dabdike> In-Reply-To: <1401484253.2364.3.camel@dabdike> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 05/30/2014 02:10 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400 >>> "John W. Linville" wrote: >> >>>> I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type... >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about: >>> >>> Approved-by: ... >>> >>> That is reserved for maintainers only? >> >> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better. > > Bikeshedded-by:? > > Discussed-in-circles-by:? > > Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:? > > OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly > clear and we don't need a new tag. Acked-by: me -- ~Randy