From: Daniel Phillips <d.phillips@partner.samsung.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [topic] Richer internal block API
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:13:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538778C5.7010505@partner.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529181319.GA24218@kroah.com>
On 05/29/2014 11:13 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:49:13AM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> This will be my annual proposal to open a general discussion about improving
>> the internal block API, to be capable of doing all the things that the ZFS
>> crowd claim are impossible without rampantly violating filesystem/raid
>> layering. Attacking this in a storage-specific venue would also be good,
>> however I view this issue as being at least as central as a number of topics
>> already raised for general consideration.
> Why didn't you bring this up at the filesystem summit a few months ago?
> That's the best place for it, not at the kernel summit.
Sorry, I did not have time to participate this year. I wonder though,
why power management is regarded as a summit-worthy topic, but core
functionality of the block layer is not.
>
>> Full disclosure dept: I have an agenda. I want to add the equivalent of
>> Raidz etc to Tux3 without reimplementing a logical volume manager in the
>> filesystem.
> Like btrfs is doing? :)
>
> greg k-h
Not like btrfs is doing, the opposite really.
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-29 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 17:49 Daniel Phillips
2014-05-29 18:13 ` Greg KH
2014-05-29 18:13 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2014-05-29 18:23 ` Greg KH
2014-05-29 18:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2014-05-29 23:43 ` Greg KH
2014-05-31 22:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2014-06-01 2:34 ` Greg KH
2014-06-02 17:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-06-02 18:10 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-01 4:31 ` NeilBrown
2014-05-30 9:56 ` Lukáš Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538778C5.7010505@partner.samsung.com \
--to=d.phillips@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox