ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Application performance: regressions, controlling preemption
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:32:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5370DB7B.2040706@fb.com> (raw)

Hi everyone,

We're in the middle of upgrading the tiers here from older kernels 
(2.6.38, 3.2) into 3.10 and higher.

I've been doing this upgrade game for a number of years now, with 
different business cards taped to my forehead and with different target 
workloads.

The result is always the same...if I'm really lucky the system isn't 
slower, but usually I'm left with a steaming pile of 10-30% regressions.

The KS dates should put us right at the end of our regression hunt, I 
can talk through the main problems we hit, how (if) we fixed them and 
hopefully offer tests to keep them from coming back.

We've split the tiers up between Josef Bacik, Jens Axboe, myself and a 
few others.  I'd nominate Josef and Jens to come share their findings as 
well.

Another topic here is controlling preemption from userland without 
needing to go full real time.  CPU intensive in-memory databases are 
leaving a ton of performance on the floor in context switches.  I'm 
hoping to experiment with better preemption controls and the userland 
RCU project to improve things.

-chris

             reply	other threads:[~2014-05-12 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-12 14:32 Chris Mason [this message]
2014-05-12 15:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-12 15:57 ` Jan Kara
2014-05-12 16:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-12 23:16 ` Greg KH
2014-05-13  1:43   ` Chris Mason
2014-05-14  1:31     ` Li Zefan
2014-05-14 12:27       ` Chris Mason
2014-05-13 12:27   ` Jan Kara
2014-05-12 23:54 ` Josh Triplett
2014-05-13  0:31   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-14 15:01     ` Fengguang Wu
2014-08-14 17:17       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-08-15  4:13         ` Fengguang Wu
2014-08-15 14:07           ` Christoph Lameter
2014-08-16  1:32             ` [Ksummit-discuss] 0day kernel performance/power test service Fengguang Wu
2014-05-28 17:08   ` [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Application performance: regressions, controlling preemption Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-18  6:21 ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5370DB7B.2040706@fb.com \
    --to=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox