From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472BB711 for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 19:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A05FB2024D for ; Tue, 13 May 2014 19:53:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Arnd Bergmann To: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 21:53:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5271808.hXAVohG7ju@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <20140513193146.GR12304@sirena.org.uk> References: <4341089.iLfxP0nJG8@wuerfel> <20140513193146.GR12304@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , dvhart@dvhart.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Driver model/resources, ACPI, DT, etc (sigh) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 13 May 2014 20:31:46 Mark Brown wrote: > > I'd heard mutterings like that from elsewhere (I don't know anything > about AMD's thoughts), and of course there's nothing stopping ARM people > just picking up the out of tree ACPI stuff and using that if they decide > they want to work that way. Sure, anyone can do that, but to me that falls into the same category as using board files, unreviewed DT bindings or FEX: do what makes you happy in a private embedded kernel fork, but don't expect that to get merged upstream. Arnd