From: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 14:42:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d8174c7-add2-43d7-a960-53c33d4c400f@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adbaa57a-4dc8-4929-b319-8dc96ce08e89@acm.org>
On 10/8/25 2:14 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/8/25 11:04 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
>> Claude really needs aggressive use of checklists to get it to stay
>> focused, other AIs may need other tricks.
>
> Would that be a reason to avoid Claude for code reviews? All I need to
> make ChatGPT or Gemini come up with a code review is to tell it that it
> should review a kernel patch pretending that it is an experienced kernel
> developer and also what issues it should look for. The AI kernel patch
> review prompts I have seen from my colleagues are about 30-40 lines
> long. However, I do not know what copyright license applies to these
> prompts so I cannot share these prompts.
>
Absolutely. If something else is better I'd gladly switch. The
discussion around how we decide what's better, and how we make it more
broadly consumable is the part I find most interesting.
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-08 17:04 Chris Mason
2025-10-08 17:20 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2025-10-08 18:11 ` Sasha Levin
2025-10-08 18:35 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-08 17:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-10-08 18:04 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-08 18:14 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-10-08 18:42 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2025-10-08 21:08 ` Kees Cook
2025-10-09 1:37 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-08 18:33 ` Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 1:43 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-09 14:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-10-08 19:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-08 19:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-08 19:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-08 19:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-08 20:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-08 20:53 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-09 9:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-09 12:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-08 19:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-08 19:50 ` Bird, Tim
2025-10-08 20:30 ` Sasha Levin
2025-10-09 12:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-08 20:30 ` James Bottomley
2025-10-08 20:38 ` Bird, Tim
2025-10-08 22:21 ` Jiri Kosina
2025-10-09 9:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-09 10:03 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-10 7:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-10 11:40 ` James Bottomley
2025-10-10 11:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-10 14:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-10 14:35 ` Bird, Tim
2025-10-09 14:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-09 14:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-09 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-10 7:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-10-10 14:15 ` Bird, Tim
2025-10-10 15:07 ` Joe Perches
2025-10-10 16:01 ` checkpatch encouragement improvements (was RE: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools) Bird, Tim
2025-10-10 17:11 ` Rob Herring
2025-10-10 17:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-10 19:21 ` Joe Perches
2025-10-10 16:11 ` [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools Steven Rostedt
2025-10-10 16:47 ` Joe Perches
2025-10-10 17:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-10-11 10:28 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-09 16:31 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-09 17:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-09 17:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-09 17:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-09 17:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-09 18:42 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-09 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-10-10 15:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-10-09 14:47 ` Bird, Tim
2025-10-09 15:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-09 17:58 ` Mark Brown
2025-10-09 1:15 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-08 20:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-10-09 12:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-09 14:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-10-10 3:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-10-10 14:12 ` Chris Mason
2025-10-31 16:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-14 7:16 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d8174c7-add2-43d7-a960-53c33d4c400f@meta.com \
--to=clm@meta.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox