From: "Iyer, Sundar" <sundar.iyer@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] System-wide interface to specify the level of PM tuning
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:49:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2FABAEF0D3DCAF4F9C9628D6E2F968454F18BA5A@BGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53223375.qzkvIEse3r@vostro.rjw.lan>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:ksummit-
> discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 7:12 AM
> To: NeilBrown
> Cc: Grant Likely; Brown, Len; Alan Stern; Kristen Carlson Accardi; ksummit-
> discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] System-wide interface to specify
> the level of PM tuning
>
> >
> > (a tiny bit like a devicetree database which contains configuration
> > rules).
> >
> > Or have I missed the point completely?
>
> No, I don't think you have missed it, but then most of subsystems and drivers in
> the kernel know what it means to be "power-friendly", so they should be able to
> choose their defaults on the basis of one single setting somewhere.
Is a "single setting somewhere" even appropriate? It is actually the intelligence needed vs executing the actions?
Cheers!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 0:22 Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-06 1:21 ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-06 14:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-06 1:40 ` NeilBrown
2015-07-06 14:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-06 13:49 ` Iyer, Sundar [this message]
2015-07-06 14:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-07 7:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-07-07 12:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-10 17:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-07-12 10:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-13 23:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-14 16:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-15 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-16 1:10 ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-16 9:19 ` David Woodhouse
2015-07-16 15:44 ` Kristen Accardi
2015-07-16 15:53 ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-16 15:58 ` Greg KH
2015-07-17 10:34 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-07-17 11:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-20 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-20 23:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-22 1:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-22 7:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-22 17:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-22 18:25 ` josh
2015-07-24 22:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-25 19:50 ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-26 0:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-26 0:16 ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-27 13:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 11:50 ` Jani Nikula
2015-07-06 16:33 ` Kristen Accardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2FABAEF0D3DCAF4F9C9628D6E2F968454F18BA5A@BGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=sundar.iyer@intel.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox