Re: [Ksummit-discuss] better hot-topic discussion processes was: Re: TAB non-nomination

[Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>]

On 9 Nov 2018, at 12:17, Jason Cooper wrote:

> +Kostantin
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:03:05PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>> So what was done with the update to the CoC was that a proposed set of
>> changes was sent out to the top 200 or so contributors to the kernel,
>> by git statistics over the past year, asking for their comments and
>> their sign-offs.  So there *was* community input, and that input did
>> result in changes to the CoC update.
>>
>> Could there be a better process?  I think we're all open to input.  If
>> someone would like to suggest a better way to handle things, that
>> would be great.  I will disclose upfront, though, that I will have to
>> politely disagree with the proposition that completely free and open
>> discussion is always the magic bullet solution.
>
> Ok, I'll take a stab at that. :)
>
> I'll make the assumption that there was nothing said in the "invited"
> discussion that the speaker would object to being a matter of public
> record.

I'm snipping the rest because you lost me right here ;)

-chris