From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dhowells@redhat.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BE409B
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:19:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0E8147
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVbTEf0rKKYOmNoHB2n0MpSgpY8jvOGXPnV=+KPxEpFKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALCETrVbTEf0rKKYOmNoHB2n0MpSgpY8jvOGXPnV=+KPxEpFKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20436.1438090619@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
	<1438096213.5441.147.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <29877.1438100339.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:18:59 +0100
Message-ID: <29878.1438100339@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Luis Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
	"ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, jkkm@jkkm.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Firmware signing
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:

> Agreed.  See about.  I don't think the concept of trust should be as
> simple as "we trust" or "we don't trust" -- we should trust certain
> vendors for certain purposes only.

How do you deal with a big vendor, like Intel, that makes lots of different
bits for lots of different purposes?

David