From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net (004.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832D6221271 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759946270; cv=none; b=FsSBWVvGBSz6y/4KIvaKWuLmBS4IJLQBkzVCWd1Hvf8+kfnjYsXGkcvOx+WDjjUzeQJ3fjXyKIyK7nuRw0rhM7Pp8Adx0HRf9xW5AsTc0pJXPO61PgB/9r+q3f5/bg33usNFLvuHpA7lCSQESH+AbsvU4lrjxONr8fug+Hilcks= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759946270; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pMjBdJh/Lys6mKpA9sUo+3Sd5j2ga3JWQAZccC9D7CU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ol7RIEFljQAFcCVbQCt79HhB64V3M5l/uGaFtWl4MKDYgwWFwboSyvASghkrdIqIuHLzQ/2/ce9rvKsX8m1e8t6dun4T620tCcEEKPdxyB+a4MSfHDotQHumv3Tf6yRLHXtk8rMzDt/5YFaA8henBq9ytpluTjxVxy8XIEPN7bk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=NPLo5Mg6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="NPLo5Mg6" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4chghW3j02zm0yVD; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:57:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1759946266; x=1762538267; bh=4aWR6onrBvWmJaOfOx03ElA0 zKoyGbPEUnFR6G/WodU=; b=NPLo5Mg6tc/KMqGM+q2celR1nArDJ6SVwtFnt2u4 c/VnXSCxRZoPrZh7IzF41z2csjtgOOdCcBwtaN8ax0VWHEhukpyg/Jwoz9SZMbTx xUDD85QngAooHQdWte1YGUotUyS+AGNGlawsH4VJHEcUGsDivm3fD60M9ZBktUbn I8OVnYiCoQCX8x0TN2X7PVoeZzXIIr57TLViDWNy+cg9JhBJVOIY8fNLqt0/k51s zaJDOD4cdFkTSlYhAo+aahPR8WEDeOBjm+hZatBmSh57ZiXxp7EVWCQqo8X/o7h5 S5/1+DelZSiWcCaEYN3LKjI0iQc1TIy1Qw4m/D3tcEcSoQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (004.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id 2tGCRSSkM_px; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:57:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.119.48.131] (unknown [104.135.180.219]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4chghR60DYzm0yVF; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <28cd7001-0a24-4dff-a4c7-714495bff7f0@acm.org> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 10:57:41 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools To: Chris Mason , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Dan Carpenter , Alexei Starovoitov References: Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/8/25 10:04 AM, Chris Mason wrote: > 2) A code indexing tool with MCP server that Claude can use to find > functions, types, and call chains more effectively. This makes it more > likely Claude can trace complex relationships in the code: Different kernel developers may prefer different AI systems. As an example, my employer expects me to use Gemini and I have seen it producing interesting code reviews. So I would prefer that any AI code review prompts that are developed for kernel developers support at least the most widely used AI systems. Thanks, Bart.