From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A213571
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  4 Aug 2016 18:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com (galahad.ideasonboard.com
	[185.26.127.97])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE93F191
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  4 Aug 2016 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 21:52:14 +0300
Message-ID: <2590942.T9bkdmq2UQ@avalon>
In-Reply-To: <20160804144433.0fdaad3e@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20160803110935.GA26270@kroah.com>
	<CAMuHMdWi0ij=umCqckG3gQP8+ySTT16v_fdpQ7d5XNNLDgj21g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160804144433.0fdaad3e@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable workflow
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thursday 04 Aug 2016 14:44:33 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:16:45 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Would publishing statistics help, like the top 10 of Ackers and Reviewers?
> > 
> > E.g. Hall of Fame of bug fixers, based on the presence of Fixes tags, and
> > Hall of Shame, based on patches CCed to stable lacking Fixes tags?
> 
> I would not have the Hall of Shame, as people just like seeing there
> name in print, they may not care if it is fame or shame.
> 
> As for the Hall of Fame, I'm not sure what I would think if I made that
> list. As most of my Fixes is for code that I originally wrote. Thus it
> just points out all the bad code I made in the past.
> 
> Reminds me of a story I heard a long time ago, about a manager that
> wanted to help encourage his programmers to find more bugs. He gave
> them a $20 bonus for every bug they found and fixed. What he forgot to
> take into consideration was that these were the same programmers that
> were writing the code they would be finding bugs in. I heard that one
> programmer racked up $10,000 before they fixed their mistake ;-)

http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-11-13

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart