Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Annotating patches containing AI-assisted code

[Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2025, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> I tend to agree that such annotations might be useful as heads-up
> markers for maintainers if nothing else, but what about missing
> annotations?
> 
> Is there a generally feasible way to figure out that they are missing?

Maybe we can use some LLM to help us decide whether the code has been 
written by a human or LLM :P

>  And if that can be done, "suspicious" changes may as well be caught
> this way, so why would the annotations be required after all?

I am not sure whether we have more options than documenting this 
requirement, and then work with our usual tool, which is building trust 
(or lack of thereof) in the individual submitters.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs