From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847B0F2D for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FBD7D2 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:11:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Laurent Pinchart To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:11:28 +0300 Message-ID: <2092331.rBCbgXVgiM@avalon> In-Reply-To: <1f375c3d2c41da463d0cd055428d2933984a5942.camel@perches.com> References: <20180919210122.694bf4a3@coco.lan> <1f375c3d2c41da463d0cd055428d2933984a5942.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , James Bottomley Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC FOR KS] CoC and Linus position (perhaps undocumented/closed/limited/invite session) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Joe, On Thursday, 20 September 2018 05:44:44 EEST Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 21:01 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > I'm actually in favor of the opposite: to remove everything that looks > > like a legal contract. > > Yes please. > > Our Responsibilities > > > ==================== > > > > Maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable > > behavior > > -and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in > > response to +and are asked to take appropriate and fair corrective action > > in response to > > any instances of unacceptable behavior. > > [] > > > -Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject > > -comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that > > are +Maintainers have the right to remove, edit, or reject > > +comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues and other contributions that > > are > > not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently > > any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, > > threatening, > > -offensive, or harmful. > > +offensive or harmful. > > This paragraph is unnecessary. > > Maintainers are responsible for code. > Community is responsible for behavior. Who is "the community", aren't maintainers part of it ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart