From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEBBF266595 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760112697; cv=none; b=A3pQpsyiAsTdTFdaetjVlwHc8Qe+Wq79THenmporfhBRXVqMiOLxMjzJLd/x+wFaxw7HzMPO5C4lcK2ZblrqypXw3UMhYeB52h8eKDV5OFKnSXquGyzw+BlQkGNr9SPxzcnrxp4o9mB5JLFaPDEoG0Jrvvfw9sSPYVMVq4uOQpg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760112697; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KnAmuUT1iJzqFcucIliuO6wVsjEnwirleHAMsgzBwkA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Y3t7aqXISwafmysTQU/ScLr0SXn/Q5XTxvlZm0CIXYqV6RSpyHWXZMp+4PuocZALUQZTRARNEq7x2pz7fiGUUE0Xu8lenXLpy3YnUzTqhYFwyER3YZFPvDhgH8wbyqHq+NujNBb/QHg/HmCKeEP/pctEZp/u1ibvX2qcIxemONg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A4387249; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DB83180015; Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 12:11:27 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Joe Perches Cc: "Bird, Tim" , "laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com" , Andrew Lunn , James Bottomley , Chris Mason , "ksummit@lists.linux.dev" , Dan Carpenter , Alexei Starovoitov , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools Message-ID: <20251010121127.05381ba8@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <739c7a03558c3c8642fc6a51de4d679ecd389365.camel@perches.com> References: <20251008192934.GH16422@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20251009091405.GD12674@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20251009103019.632db002@gandalf.local.home> <20251010075909.GE29493@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <739c7a03558c3c8642fc6a51de4d679ecd389365.camel@perches.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DB83180015 X-Stat-Signature: 8gqo5waec1dxubou91moy76e6zh6ohmw X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout02 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+JPDE08c2WGY2o8hxjrWkBwvfDpqCAGg0= X-HE-Tag: 1760112684-194682 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1+iC2TfalFj18atrubFQoFuWoxdo7Iy89GP4vmT/m+AmIQYYoy0ROSz654M4a6meqmuQ4/Z33dZLjx/SWbmSi8tSyXkcyDFM4JfVAJPLdY51wsoqpJROUQBOalax1tx2TT+39QIlaQ8xPAjTsAzw4RvBHgBaUiWqikU7Wv42GaAPQ8mNET5vND68rbTvNXq2W8h4bc55HFfpAPjcAHUXaYXWzMfnB5MtPOdZRIhu2WRtOM8HTHbzAUzkQ7oPlLbXvTOOMAM4DPgzZj7tNRmdzrVllGV/y4tZYz1D5Q/KZFyTydjolM0Aoqi1baj1ceTmI9z2lnvs562tordm2EIi4WbT6RouaKfVQSnDTFL4LWDQA7biNcIVQ/j On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:07:39 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 14:15 +0000, Bird, Tim wrote: > > I have ideas to address the false positive rate, based on features that checkpatch.pl > > already has, as well as ideas for handling some of the concerns that running > > checkpatch.pl (or an equivalent) at build time would raise. Some of these might > > apply to AI review as well. Let me know if you want me to elaborate, or if we > > should just discuss in Tokyo. > > Please elaborate. Note, checkpatch.pl fails on pretty much anything in include/trace, as those files contain complex macros that are basically their own language. Anything that tries to make them follow kernel conventions simply makes the output uglier and harder to read. -- Steve