From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5689F2EC54A for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760022363; cv=none; b=iSDAeIk1TqvGbsVczx86d73CeGG/P16vWOKqsG5wLOWjGwcMKq5jAFH1yEZ10ZQ9jt/zYWDYSQ0mYiKJ8welKZ+uHr/IYT4z/U5Saf+aY/NoFuv0gX+J4gyYDh3eYURibpUkrXZovNYcn3QwEcdz6Lacch7vrs98mOt9mtTh/Yc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760022363; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qzU0HvHH6t1ObJdQ3KtkI5h7qGdAzvStHCjmTRyHDMM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OC6bRPS/QWBSHO9ue/nDJT3fvCcYATQz5Ud5uuTzg0+zKminAsPI9V1uW64vTAFfDxVU7cRQIgWInF37JZ7Iev/ELZaWx+0JHPl293ynSdli9r0rhxVw0G2BteI7w2NwxJT5MY6uSWlxQKBsh0EdkQQI0EQlT3P+qwmkwL+IqD0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf11.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB0C8853F; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 825FF20031; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 11:05:57 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Laurent Pinchart , "Bird, Tim" , James Bottomley , Chris Mason , "ksummit@lists.linux.dev" , Dan Carpenter , Alexei Starovoitov , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools Message-ID: <20251009110557.5585327a@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20251008192934.GH16422@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20251009091405.GD12674@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20251009103019.632db002@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 825FF20031 X-Stat-Signature: y6p4zhw1rh6gwc595jog9x3nn3ecmx7o X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX19QnDYwS7FIwjz3vx4tMnNtqKuryxKCPsI= X-HE-Tag: 1760022357-433535 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19K4zwsqr8DfqOO8NQKZljnLKOploXVUnrS1avWpc4FKjP0DdJrSODCNVo88Pq9aLGwH64nD3uV/73eYfa5YfC4EbNaFSCFaZItm/4dz28db/7HbYTBfqaC/piBX4hA6/b2evnPxONeephN38SeiU0EPPRYPipQvIL/+TYAiZhHwR0CbZgYg8732unA6T8gDs12lcxKSfiOYy2Gbu0Mr5SrmIcdXXs92oYs6ocoBV9bBN5Ucu3y3N9e+uPrxmn5kqpJadwXVZMwLzulpKumMy9Jq0BG4S27drZCbAUzRILujFmHpYOsyVvg On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 16:51:39 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > One way I see this working is to attach it to patchwork. Sending a patch to > > the BPF mailing list has their patchwork trigger a bunch of tests and it > > will tell you if it passed or failed. I'm assuming if it failed, it doesn't > > add it to patchwork and the maintainers will ignore it. > > Not quite, at least not for netdev, which shares some infrastructure > with BPF. Patches get ingested into patchwork, and then some time > later, the CI system will get them from patchwork and run the > tests. The results are then added to patchwork, both as red/yellow/green > traffic lights, and clickable links to the test results. Failing tests > don't automatically cause patchwork to change the status to "Change > Requested", a human is needed to look at the actual failures and > decide if the patch should be rejected or not. Thanks for the clarification. I'm just a submitter to the system and see the feedback it gives, which looks nice (even though it's mostly irrelevant to me as I simply Cc the bpf mailing list to let them know what I'm doing on the tracing side). -- Steve