From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 187F91F462D for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:20:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759944025; cv=none; b=X7ILff5lNl3WuZjEJRFn/vlcjb+bnVGonI7n5QWGDiSKKu5b1xJbTvVcsedl3hfjrQlj0X/kZtiOXl/PHrWn4LONvpgjs0bAu5+bFKlvG+ebRMq5KfrgaWwPNHtAgNBGY0OGlzcTpZ0soApICZI5nge575XkKZ8/c+tjHCNFX9o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759944025; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KA1tU83NbKCMtMsOPUn940BgdVTHAcgLh2Au5MBj3V4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H/rjddS+nBpWOeTrOn4zsHnXYRkvGSZcDjzs0h8P+l4kfkknRkCn6ReOFjT00p7gKOkeVcMHvnKqraCTIc7WHTVEvmT/YVknXVFsjCrlQNbS8Zuh4tQaLef3yQvuu2mwtisTP9nt0QCawBcCw8Jp7LxKT5mONRkVKiBGRb2niEU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=UuMXg0K1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="UuMXg0K1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D48AC4CEF4; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 17:20:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1759944022; bh=KA1tU83NbKCMtMsOPUn940BgdVTHAcgLh2Au5MBj3V4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UuMXg0K1aU4uXPv7jbQiUq2BpUptJ9lqzrB7oBnpXvzffKqe9JBnf9a+/Ho3QOY6T TaN9i1xRgXZ+2ohp6vRh9eceUPQ8zkU/wbpBU1rGqySs9cUPHXgUS4S8TX8WF7D8Nn 5oHzxpuEGX3L6eHGPFJyO9fCYpg/ahQDNnkn+zbE= Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:20:21 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Chris Mason Cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Dan Carpenter , Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools Message-ID: <20251008-lively-vermilion-snail-beff9a@lemur> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 01:04:54PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > My goal for KS/MS is to discuss how to enable maintainers to use review > automation tools to lower their workload. I don't want to build new CI > here, so the goal would be enabling integration with existing CI. > > My question for everyone is what would it take to make all of this > useful? I am generally of the opinion that it's more useful to talk about it than to ignore it. Clearly, this is a controversial subject -- many will liken introducing proprietary AI tooling to what happened with bitkeeper. I've been working on incorporating series summarization with b4, but I'm trying to make it work with ollama/gemma3 so as not to introduce a proprietary dependency. My results are probably a lot more hit-and-miss than with Claude 4.5 Sonnet -- but I find it hard to judge because the summaries *look* reasonably good to someone who is not a maintainer of that particular subsystem. Maybe it's more of a BoF session material? -K