From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96DB42AD00 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754416752; cv=none; b=iC7ybMXsTDcUC7a++wq82GT6SwLf6u1n/clooH6p20uuRPsqaAFCZ4nBsIKgW5JE54v2pfbVe4Yjs5t6vyPh+uf83X+I/EIvHnRQSaz5yeLzJsF9+Gvg8f9XU3XCYRQegIKEaetv/WZe8DKgi4N+FtpucDG7GLrlsOgpmaXxWPs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754416752; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kNN8YtIJ3UYkaTHCu7ve0GLBBkHpJV24RAx+MDDOsSk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=i+WhGoSqMODV81H1DagLgzP8jxix5BVnu093an+3AfDgZHmvR0sUYts6S/VLZ4nJNWSokWKQhTEqo2jYPxWQNhLQZHlpslR2CWQi7nAVYBa68goKBmuChyPz/HNCI03JVjsxn3NVuhlhLZ5+RsK8ld0J2nfzTJv2e9uMuqd26Io= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=PM8Mk9K3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="PM8Mk9K3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3555C4CEF0; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:59:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1754416752; bh=kNN8YtIJ3UYkaTHCu7ve0GLBBkHpJV24RAx+MDDOsSk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PM8Mk9K357fiH3Q4qPwQM3lC8aIdYcxKQB/xJ/ngOOZfSi8mCGesVgPqJq1mqYS3F vdByPXlIl5eigCp5XsHwhzatQg77TR5ZLUWmICgqVYK82O6loNKck2uoqOq/XLDyGb +DVS1l6wvVop/fIP5f70m0vpZ06WKaQcF9dkki2o= Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 13:59:10 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Sasha Levin Cc: Steven Rostedt , Mark Brown , Jiri Kosina , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] The amount of -stable emails Message-ID: <20250805-mottled-granite-otter-3dadde@lemur> References: <162r47q9-rp56-67so-7032-2r1rn36p03n6@fhfr.pbz> <9dbe8a42-e43a-4beb-acfa-3ed1c069fa47@sirena.org.uk> <20250805122828.68312a8d@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 01:14:24PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > Now, if something is marked for stable, I really don't want to be bothered > > that it made it to a stable tree. If I marked something for stable, sending > > me an email that it was applied is rather redundant. > > So I'd love to cancel the "Added to the stable tree" mails. I honestly > don't even know why they go out: my understanding that it was for > historical reasons where someone asked for those in the past, but I > really feel bad about sending those out because to me they are pure > spam. I can suggest that you write them to a public-inbox feed instead. We can then pull that into lore so they still show up for people performing context queries, but we don't ever deliver them via SMTP. -K