From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.alien8.de (mail.alien8.de [65.109.113.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8381D147C86 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.109.113.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722260342; cv=none; b=Q2XoxFrzAlOI+zCJqKCJVlESOyMOUe+FVC6QQZHbpYT6MnFbqO3EX+wtz1OtBz38x7CYj40T4DFip3Q7i0XV7gKtYM/EWSK+adutVw9S1JWeuA5Wh1+idGgqD+pjfkW6rz0jQAxl9U5p3DU71/Pe/WYF0YiLJgm5z9sspjNw0a0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722260342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oVZFc5CBw7YA4rLnsafZusMUpxS0moOS+oXkGV9rc2I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dHBUqd7HS+WXrqkKtXSxTjwqTlkHjKqHZhtRwyqGmOypb/PiTO6PXD3lAMZhoWWES/z9ItQm943gLwYBzIU0ZLtTz1FigxxeuXeB0jT3dRDik9bOK7hFe6Gg6vW4XTM77ss5FATGfG3ulQzeZ/E+23P0/ka8fu3kMflgvfb6eno= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b=AgVhJJET; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.109.113.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="AgVhJJET" Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alien8.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTP id 6C6A040E01BB; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:38:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.alien8.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de Received: from mail.alien8.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id noWZecipXnn2; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:38:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=alien8; t=1722260335; bh=6M34f2ihb4+3H0wUmQ1u+7VEn4WqvtJH076NQAw2b7k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AgVhJJETHkOWA4oelX7sfHwA2DziVZ7hBTiK53QUNGO1S94qfBYEpMiOHL1NpgKFD PVHHDnq+ekVgm90DP64zl+TasYg9bzRJEwg/cASIM+/ONKuIEnLYxwtSMsOYzrfk7w pwHnbYSE4U1cnKqr+HAMNAJdXww2S1uhFAXUyz2rK8+ixvqeMqa6MYTcY3u5uiBReB +CA277WoEV7SQhfeeIKNz6OmheErotEVBTGQmeZNYLktll2N9b8nfGy9FEUFpbezn3 50VP7NAx94q1T6A5kxEHwOBTrFj3pjlwWuYPsWmfmD7uSeDU48MOqUvcw2rfiX8qUS FBlYhK5AGW+o8w6fr9JA9N+/yayvOKhDO4oKoN+1Wnfao2AFiG5VQuOt8+703je6QG GKbTdURnPf/ZaK9PSGQr3C75EIvsPj6LdktgP9YnjeVpbh4HAQ3Rp1UaX3lDINJ67H 1N/uh7DIy3V5ehdmj7tzHbEv6DE1ocaiOF/2hUPcRd6ngk9e91Q2E9U+w1w85/k51s o5qvqEFLdLkA344r7AJxTl3b+sBXAPzxb4gvGLsoPnqN7RD66Si9PjzCGvK9bO0Zz7 mfJuXUTOwZsI+IZh8tz+wlYqXNDehGdGtQUg07YzQNklG1cktApc24DDk3PgwSCW+t vadOGg3X2rCMnUHOGzj86Z9U= Received: from zn.tnic (p5de8ee85.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.232.238.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alien8.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2D59140E01A8; Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:38:39 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Dan Williams , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful? Message-ID: <20240729133839.GDZqebX1LXB-Pt7_iO@fat_crate.local> References: <668c67a324609_ed99294c0@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> <20240729134512.0000487f@Huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240729134512.0000487f@Huawei.com> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 01:45:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > One of the key bits of feedback we've had on that series is that it > should be integrated with EDAC. Part of the reason being need to get > appropriate RAS expert review. If you mean me with that, my only question back then was: if you're going to integrate it somewhere and instead of defining something completely new - you can simply reuse what's there. That's why I suggested EDAC. IOW, the question becomes, why should it be a completely new thing and not part of EDAC? That's all. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette