From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B09383A5 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 16:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722182638; cv=none; b=GqJdn0ucsRioCcn1UlKrSt/L8L8jw4VRHhPUmzspA4y7s7i2rs6iW9x9JHgxTRdZRBpfC93V9JEewVQ0tJ/ka06BYR0ZSQJ7tFnA8oR1oBFgPxgiNt6oQ14439KhodbPTRpkNlWSzY6qpEql1fv0wKNsYRewvOpIPHmWyx1zJtA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722182638; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WDJQlNgfGdna4CzkFsZF6kX6g9+Fgl0J7SogRdc7wfo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fky8FF7xqO+THWzFa9CyYrF+nRu3G8E5o9BdYi+zKvexYxJAQaRSJ8EVD28f647GeVycjcmAbaA8yKpxTO9WjNnu8Px4B+rwklawZHyvABX/ATb61yAs05oKJwmg1q4C2jLg2qknl8sM5mT8RY1OXcsPmOk7a+q+yyAn+/k7rtY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=YU5VAwNX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="YU5VAwNX" Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (81-175-209-231.bb.dnainternet.fi [81.175.209.231]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EEC86BE; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:03:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1722182589; bh=WDJQlNgfGdna4CzkFsZF6kX6g9+Fgl0J7SogRdc7wfo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YU5VAwNX5Kt8Sc3+hJ8YS8q8R6TE56J72L6fCH5eNINWRKOQQqWEsaim/LzSDVVEr K273umqC/qi4WZyxXYenYMBwPCY+y7Ux/PdEOENH8RRS8crjZ2/IFj7FgPmnbU0nbS 9f8JXG+Hsas0gmFG0LsQefU/f7Wg5hKTEDkg1+SQ= Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 19:03:36 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Dan Williams , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful? Message-ID: <20240728160336.GG30973@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <668c67a324609_ed99294c0@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> <20240726142731.GG28621@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20240726113434.56200a0e@rorschach.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240726113434.56200a0e@rorschach.local.home> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 11:34:34AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:27:31 +0300 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > I know this is a topic proposed for the maintainers summit, but given > > the number of people who seem to have an opinion and be interested in > > dicussing it, would a session at LPC be a better candidate ? I don't > > expect the maintainer summit to invite all relevant experts from all > > subsystems, that would likely overflow the room. > > > > The downside of an LPC session is that it could easily turn into a > > heated stage fight, and there are probably also quite a few arguments > > that can't really be made in the open :-S > > You can always submit a BoF. We have also had last minute BoFs made if > there's rooms available. We could also possibly expand the V4L2 vs. DRM discussion in the Complex Camera MC to cover this, as there's an important overlap. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart