From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4981211CA1 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722004073; cv=none; b=YfOJROrldIj2wB0eTkMWhppDYVZ7WrFw6YgpS04xfZ3MNx5QOg4E/6ATKCCK0d70JR0kyt0XaE+AtdCQZ/6ytlnbMpYDDciZGkXGxwZvN2f3rqnLoMM2DkNJ6zHwVrRWK4pC9F2h5WDh08LCwOpgn9h8T3FEvRR49nq6TsXf7LY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722004073; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3K+N/WHbXjjnH8pnbfRV/+Az398N9drgCA+VrJy1wpM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=S749mHJ6ZIMVSrAyUkirP7D55UCAsUs7F5s3/g5DNqOyFRrRaBMp/oG7lovkcBQGdusq3MTus+gMFq5c9bJoiRbZzAVNrD0iMSBytdKuiwcMKNSyDjKJGB8ThGgEBMa4tBY0La/+zlaqK7/DTzApVaf3zB0wMqMRz1Duv5zg2ZQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=fL6vwMll; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="fL6vwMll" Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (81-175-209-231.bb.dnainternet.fi [81.175.209.231]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AC858CC; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:27:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1722004026; bh=3K+N/WHbXjjnH8pnbfRV/+Az398N9drgCA+VrJy1wpM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fL6vwMllu5ElFtSMQ64fANuvmD2nXXEOCP1rDmMo+bjnq8592hefrpPNFjEOUPIeU Vk/aqvkCp8wwBv7N2I68LR0yl4x6ipQVgCxJiAogaWThv0t0leAdMtNgVfpr7ABYDj X3eO/lDMH88pQkCEJfJ2kdaqEFmN9zit8Q99rGX8= Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:27:31 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Dan Williams Cc: ksummit@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Device Passthrough Considered Harmful? Message-ID: <20240726142731.GG28621@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <668c67a324609_ed99294c0@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <668c67a324609_ed99294c0@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> I know this is a topic proposed for the maintainers summit, but given the number of people who seem to have an opinion and be interested in dicussing it, would a session at LPC be a better candidate ? I don't expect the maintainer summit to invite all relevant experts from all subsystems, that would likely overflow the room. The downside of an LPC session is that it could easily turn into a heated stage fight, and there are probably also quite a few arguments that can't really be made in the open :-S -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart