From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C9F28495; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719411401; cv=none; b=uh+wu/gMA6i0tgj9isvXdnQvAjNoQeta/4Vig74zr8bvU+fmG+uIOJcTEKqcm6uhiMZFfZoWJFEqj3FpfGQTXRxIdUwFWz7qIAIyApL3Ws0VEPWwJAuOH3dHvhJFULpDzuXe1xhy1ug74pk1eOEBh1VpqQOiREj6Fw+0cPo+UgQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719411401; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BRs7yKKIEJjHjfCSav5qFX0qIBT++tHJPPAaw9tc/LI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ErzEGAw8O6Bdo8/oX9Sdietta75/KMElt9hiHy3sJxJSU+EV4SUwKKUld7Uj3CAWb0B24cWxtB7df5g6gI1WVzEME8CY3e1fSjB4fHL+70txJlOi3sAqeLEreZs81km45sIRyYgs5GPi5Tdq8xTNxiVb2OW8E6K0XPf8k0DnTBo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=coJ/Nk5R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="coJ/Nk5R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D34DFC116B1; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:16:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1719411401; bh=BRs7yKKIEJjHjfCSav5qFX0qIBT++tHJPPAaw9tc/LI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=coJ/Nk5RY2qbkjfAXZwmuX9TK89cjfAqNFDK4rpjgud7kc+brMZC8LwCyJEoBDfQU idKQ6ohoAlMZAs1bLZXU9VlyZ3wk/3aIsNgI+gM+2Y+0Wbr9azLEml1W3MZL+wAjST U1hHBszv9S5K8v8SQMbJAWl5devzH6+Tg8qQyT4g= Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:16:36 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Steven Rostedt , Jonathan Corbet , Carlos Bilbao , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: best practices for using Link trailers Message-ID: <20240626-olivine-spaniel-of-gallantry-9c904a@meerkat> References: <20240618-docs-patch-msgid-link-v1-0-30555f3f5ad4@linuxfoundation.org> <20240618-docs-patch-msgid-link-v1-2-30555f3f5ad4@linuxfoundation.org> <20240625172727.3dd2ad67@rorschach.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:12:35AM GMT, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > + Link: https://patch.msgid.link/patch-source-msgid@here > > > > Hmm, I mentioned this in the other thread, but I also like the fact > > that my automated script uses the list that it was Cc'd to. That is, if > > it Cc'd linux-trace-kernel, if not, if it Cc'd linux-trace-devel, it > > adds that, otherwise it uses lkml. Now, I could just make the lkml use > > the patch-source-msgid instead. > > > > This does give me some information about what the focus of the patch > > was. Hmm, maybe I could just make it: > > > > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/patch-source-msgid@here # linux-trace-devel > > > > Would anyone have an issue with that? > > Or, just like with lore links: > > https://patch.msgid.link/linux-trace-devel/patch-source-msgid@here I don't recommend this because it is not always a reliable mechanism to just take the local part of the list address and assume that it will match the list directory on lore.kernel.org. We've had lists that moved around or got renamed, or disambiguated for clarity. Overall, we're generally moving away from "where was this sent?" having any importance -- we already support lei queries and should soon have bridges exposing patches submitted via forge interfaces. If you want to indicate the focus of the patch, then going by the list to which it was sent is going to increasingly lose importance. -K