From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5770B6107 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (213-243-189-158.bb.dnainternet.fi [213.243.189.158]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B76A188E; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 19:15:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1692378954; bh=j2taSrxNzBTgxNU3pKICntffb0B5RwVuebami6OIHbg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ri1wTZ4WEMCfKAxHB27HOvPa3CP3cmT4GzltfO/GTyzzx+BD7vnzw2sQq5fBMVkZm GLYe+AK3iCLuxzQtvdHXH7xnKPRktK4d3InI052ZG+VCjofxY6wBAZpnw2Oe4BeMCC JAkNwF1QgOHv5tQBS0qYl7H64qVYj5JiWHrmmYe0= Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 20:17:15 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Mark Brown Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Jani Nikula , Luis Chamberlain , Josef Bacik , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, Jeff Layton , Song Liu , Greg KH Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Maintainer burnout Message-ID: <20230818171715.GA31744@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20230816180808.GB2919664@perftesting> <87ttsx98ue.fsf@intel.com> <20230817124255.GI21668@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20230817150336.GJ21668@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20230818153045.GB13558@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 05:23:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 06:30:45PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 07:41:43PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > > > No, it does not. The point is that you don't need to point out trivial > > > mistakes anymore, nor devote time to find them. > > > > Just by judging the length of the bot's reply and the importance of > > > the spotted issues, you can make an assessment. > > > But you'll still need to reply to the submitter to tell what to expect. > > As far as I understand, this was considered enough of an issue by Greg > > to be automated to remove even the human need to push a button, see > > https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/forms/patch_bot. > > I have a bunch of template mails like that too. One of them includes a > general suggestion to fix issues from existing reviews, including bot > output. Do you have any automated way to send some of those mails, or is it always manual ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart