From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3DA270 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB20761425; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:19:39 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Mark Brown Cc: Mike Rapoport , Leon Romanovsky , James Bottomley , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Rethinking the acceptance policy for "trivial" patches Message-ID: <20210422111939.0c555039@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20210422132339.GF4572@sirena.org.uk> References: <20210422124023.GD4572@sirena.org.uk> <20210422132339.GF4572@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:23:39 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > > For me the most annoying is to get several patches from the middle of a > > series. IMHO, sending at least cover letter to everyone is the bare minimum > > so that people at least can take a look at high level details and request a > > repost. > > Yes, the cover letter should always go to everyone. And that's still the one thing that quilt send-mail does not support :-p -- Steve