From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA4CC433DF for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E682077D for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 41E682077D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14522882AA; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HvVv5u54rDxT; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D278826C; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B407C0865; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06346C016F; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014BB89A92; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sBzS8ptWzAWn; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5D189A1B; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 519D62077D; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 12:35:16 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Mark Brown Message-ID: <20200709123516.3972dee8@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200709161351.GF4960@sirena.org.uk> References: <79214066-3886-e0ef-f26e-8cb3d53404be@linuxfoundation.org> <20200709124327.369781a0@coco.lan> <93fc3afb-8c3f-0fb9-3b92-adfb6571e060@linuxfoundation.org> <20200709161351.GF4960@sirena.org.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Chris Mason , Tibor Raschko Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:13:51 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:01:18AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 7/9/20 4:43 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > For coherency, if "blacklist/whitelist" won't be used anymore, an > > > alternative to graylist should also be provided. > > > What is "graylist"? Does it mean in between allow/deny? > > Yes. Typically it's used in situations where you don't want to deny > something but might for example want to do extra checks to verify that > things are OK. The only time I use greylist is for postgrey, that when an email comes in, it will initially reject it, expecting the mail server to try again, and the second time it lets it through. This does stop a lot of spam, at the cost of waiting up to a few hours for email :-/ -- Steve _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss