From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91375C433DF for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A1F020715 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="E2900dOp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5A1F020715 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021BE260A9; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RPhhuWuwaqOn; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BC625FA7; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BF5C0893; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854EDC016F for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C79920010 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uhiuhhIK40yW for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com (mail-pg1-f193.google.com [209.85.215.193]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCAA1FEED for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id d4so18571161pgk.4 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:53:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IaQi7Xp42ftquKfgwNd6G15TPvj7K9LsvnIqneB2JPM=; b=E2900dOp6ACJ2Rm6CME9oay/0h85cf3q6yzSh/VapfNYjWBQz9pWrlJ6JipPzD+tPH 7b4oYeCKTTv8mcNfjO2fSIyDDD78dsLcpTt2MOEYEjkLTes4QZVrOVXjXB9rW14fBNmw UlL1NFzXiL0Q3iFUMOrU5nnao1wywsR8TZ4/k= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IaQi7Xp42ftquKfgwNd6G15TPvj7K9LsvnIqneB2JPM=; b=TfF7H8rZ5EgeNcuAOYQ4Sk/mZnMTsTG6k9rTLUOZDiaq3HYqStbMjznokbXgAHcdaO 2zm6Vi67JfwX6tOKrTBpA7tTaAWyWydm16MuDg1I28uy4DJkoTRyOAH6cxJvZmAt3Tdz zW+aaqeVdtJKngV78UYjwpDBQrpSQ9R4gA+siLhjh9P/hzoOYvVwN29uLKHDznItOVpR on9iAE2GkNHT6IFr53a7nsWCtMBmvCR0TgPpA+gSMy2dCsk6yBr/RERT9dOL8xmT+gq9 iDsR1aeapMfuZ6rY/8ney5XYWWh7cVlD8hNVXP3jvEWsK2yVZTyV3fhc5u6tKyrSTQOn BbAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GVAYNlezvz6dXbPWDTDF9wMYKNm7pOC+nqX0Aaef0Gja3QaSV Wcu9FFY0gOETbB7dvOyjJh55vg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJlovwNXf7zCxj78F7E5i5D4JnbKX+EyYsl0M3/qGMeuAx1r4WbCmBjeR9tYH0R5iv7TEDzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:8489:: with SMTP id k131mr45654008pfd.4.1594050807911; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e191sm19488211pfh.42.2020.07.06.08.53.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Jul 2020 08:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 08:53:25 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Message-ID: <202007060853.07B4D4F9@keescook> References: <159389297140.2210796.13590142254668787525.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <920e6dc0-628b-9bad-926a-d1238a373cda@infradead.org> <202007041804.B5E229E2B6@keescook> <8c0c1050-3beb-86f6-f184-4687acffd61d@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8c0c1050-3beb-86f6-f184-4687acffd61d@gmail.com> Cc: ksummit , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, expensivestephen@hotmail.com, Chris Mason Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Sender: "Ksummit-discuss" On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:15:38PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On 7/5/20 3:10 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 08:10:33PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >> Left-right tree makes no sense. It doesn't distinguish the rbtree from its > >> predecessor the avl tree. I don't think it's helpful to rename a standard > >> piece of computing terminology unless it's actually hurting us to have it. > >> Obviously if it were called a "master-slave" tree, I would be in favour of > >> renaming it. > > > > (No one has suggested renaming red/black trees, so I think the > > slippery-slope argument can be set aside here.) > > > > As for the actual proposal on white/black-list, I've always been annoyed > > by the poor description it provides (and I get to see it A LOT being > > the seccomp maintainer). I welcome allow/deny-list (though the change is > > not new for seccomp -- the man pages were updated last year (thanks > > mkerrisk). :) > > Actually, the manual pages are ahead of the game only thanks to > a nice presentation last year @OSS from Stephen Kenigbolo :-). Ah-ha, cool. I think I found it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtS_t3FHWe0 -- Kees Cook _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss