From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C24DC49ED6 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D31D2089F for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="oQ5g/h6c" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0D31D2089F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9BB1293; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A043BEA2 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:03:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC29832 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:03:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1W6YCiM140B4UoknlS3lA6Z7ErGzTYhOjkJmX6U4a1E=; b=oQ5g/h6ceWpPZocTpbEJRLG1y kal2vwvHvSWkTCA8YluLz4jxo1/lK0w0wSTyQ4j8GBTESAV2o9DYk+2hqliLKW+dlRW5K5FecRooE JLAxoxaD6CufvnCKkmfW5UfP2SDuSYcYqUaj6p4QHIbL0xeQR5nuIeYBlpQfpi6y3mGFueiLUnjfY L6lznGW6fSz13twdwGaVIuELEPQV14AdH+zURqJ/5kz4rG16WN69FwpTAjh+wNtFrH6/aTAfJXjwm gwFO27S5f1RCDtuIfMwE6FnMMmo+bqjFCqhHuW6/WGu2jZtf7QoHHbU0/IxIr2nw3H/1bANG7U4Ub cAv+PO6uQ==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i80PE-0002xi-1E; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:03:24 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:03:24 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Boyd Message-ID: <20190911110323.GA10765@infradead.org> References: <20190902222240.GE3367@mit.edu> <574c0ccd-730a-eada-966c-58f5de7c9477@redhat.com> <20190903172708.qrvaad2paze6ifhz@chatter.i7.local> <20190904120843.GD4811@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20190904134706.GA14421@pure.paranoia.local> <87lfv3w3v6.fsf@intel.com> <20190911095305.36104206A1@mail.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190911095305.36104206A1@mail.kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , ksummit , Konstantin Ryabitsev Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Topics for the Maintainer's Summit X-BeenThere: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Errors-To: ksummit-discuss-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:53:04AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Independent of the exact process, a git branch for every series would > > be great. As a maintainer, I would love to be able to do 'git fetch > > some-remote '. I don't really care to write and maintain > > code to apply series and figure out what branch they apply to. That > > code already exists and I'm sure is more robust. > > +1. It would be huge if 'git am' could gain the ability to apply an mbox > (which it can already do) and parse out the tags to add them to all the > right patches. I have a script that mostly does this but it needs some > more work because sometimes people reply to the cover letter and say > their reviewed-by tag applies to patches 1-3, 5 and 6 and parsing that > isn't necessarily easy. Yes, that would help a lot. Any ignoring cover letters and allowing for normal diff fuzz so that it doesn't completely fail with the slightest movement in lines. And a vaguely git-rebase like way to resolve conflicts instead of the current mess requring a manual patch application. _______________________________________________ Ksummit-discuss mailing list Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss