From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1DF2BA6 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75AA01FB for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:41:25 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Mark Brown Message-ID: <20190828114125.GA31462@kroah.com> References: <20190827134836.GB25038@kroah.com> <20190827153344.GC534@kroah.com> <20190827195351.GA30710@kroah.com> <20190828090837.GA31704@kroah.com> <20190828104219.GC4298@sirena.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190828104219.GC4298@sirena.co.uk> Cc: Joel Fernandes , Barret Rhoden , ksummit , Jonathan Nieder , Tomasz Figa , Han-Wen Nienhuys , Theodore Tso , David Rientjes , Dmitry Torokhov , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Allowing something Change-Id (or something like it) in kernel commits List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:42:19AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:08:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > How about this, when sending a v2, you have it be in response to the v1 > > patch? Same for v3, have it be in response for the v2 one. And so on. > > That seems like it might confuse mail readers and have them do > interesting things with threading so they don't group the entire new > version of the series together but instead split it through the earlier > versions. Works fine with mutt :)