Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Keeping reviews meaningful

[Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 949 bytes --]


> > Right, if you commit it then you are responsible for it. It does not matter
> > whether you reviewed it yourself or relied on someone else review.
> 
> It's a bit amazing (and scary) that this is even being discussed (as though
> it's unknown) after these many years.

Guys, I am just trying to better cope with an amount of patches I can't
handle on my own currently.

My strategy to get more people involved is divide and conquer, e.g. look
for people willing to maintain a single driver. That makes the "trust
matrix" kind of complex. So, I still do think I can improve where to put
my always-too-limited efforts by documenting where I put it in the past.

I can keep track of that differently than a R-b tag, that is fine with
me.

I never had the intention of sneaking out of responsibility and I only
sign patches I am sure they are ready to be upstreamed. This discussion
exists because I want to keep this state.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]