From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FB46CC6
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:11:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org
	[198.137.202.133])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7C2D8C4
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:11:46 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20190715141146.1f7b17fd@coco.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20190715170045.GB3068@mit.edu>
References: <20190706142738.GA6893@kunai>
	<CAMuHMdUVtz6_3-9_+QLRWt6x7fauvA0K4p77eOcyVWo_oO9g5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20190708115949.GC1050@kunai> <20190715125800.22a9a979@coco.lan>
	<20190715170045.GB3068@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Keeping reviews
 meaningful
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

Em Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:00:45 -0400
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> escreveu:

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:58:00PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:

> I'd suggest changing the text to read:
> 
>  	 - Acked-by: indicates an agreement by the maintainer or
> 	   reviewer of the the relevant code that the patch is
> 	   appropriate for inclusion into the kernel.

Yeah, that sounds clearer.

> My concern is that if we have dozens of "Acked-by" by people who are
> not domain experts in any part of the code in the git log, it's just
> noise in the system. 

Agreed.

Thanks,
Mauro