From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <broonie@sirena.co.uk>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92EBC2752
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  8 Jul 2019 14:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk
	[172.104.155.198])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7DB892
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  8 Jul 2019 14:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:57:29 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Message-ID: <20190708145729.GD12731@sirena.co.uk>
References: <20190706142738.GA6893@kunai>
	<CAMuHMdUVtz6_3-9_+QLRWt6x7fauvA0K4p77eOcyVWo_oO9g5g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUVtz6_3-9_+QLRWt6x7fauvA0K4p77eOcyVWo_oO9g5g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Keeping reviews
	meaningful
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>


--fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:21:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> I have a fifth thesis: many people (incl. guilty me) browse quickly
> through many patches flying by on mailing lists, but don't always go to
> the effort of replying if they don't see something wrong immediately.
> This means we don't catch a share of the reviews happening.

Right, and it's also a lot easier to review in the negative ("I
found a problem!") than it is to review in the positive and say
you're confident that something is OK which means that even with
more thorough reviews there's a bias against reporting.

--fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl0jWdkACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9B9qwf/baAkUmz0E66/oJMiLMIUv6KHzC3uC0CRcYAKtVwBV8NT3pyfAcDYDe6V
vpVjmjnDlZ7eZ7TWcCEiGajnDXohZlJiG7HPlAvr0RTco8KwX+65WnySS0scz9OZ
Tlipiv26X/6B2E8Oe50oQx5Qm7i+GCmnkAt1rAhonCFvLgkFKMU7Jzkkpis8I+sk
DpWAnNC5hAhLgNJeJQTCRVVGcI8GyF9DqLNdMNHW0GoaHVq81UOSqFCR4mnTofR4
sW7nDCfa4hC+eZogyJiq+zjeSNce535xppknYcEDCFDtZCd+8xe9FsCO0BptMZHn
WI1e5Rxg5nGyMq7yl51s8BE2J2iDxQ==
=TVxU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+--