From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D918E34 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [172.104.155.198]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904E2854 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:51:02 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <20190603155102.GX2456@sirena.org.uk> References: <96c97a27-83a2-b86c-2880-984c9fa6d4b5@linuxfoundation.org> <20190531021421.GA8123@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Talking code or talking in code! List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 09:42:52AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > Let me go over my vision for this time slot at the Maintainers Summit > if we choose to add it. This isn't going to be a long deep dive session > on the research. I asked Isabella to work with the following outline: > - A short summary of Sentimine > - A short survey of 2 or 3 emails. We do the survey - I can have her > share the survey format ahead of time. Based on my recollection of > the survey from OSLS presentation, it asks participants to identify > the tone of the email. Positive/negative/neutral. > - Isabella compares these results to the tool's analysis. The goal > is to see how far off the tool's analysis from real developers > take on these emails. Does that need to be done at the summit or could it be done offline with the summit attendees (or with a list of people pulled from the active developers stats or something for that matter)? But then... > In addition, I think the tool should also look at clarity of > communication not just tone. To me this is the most useful part for > us. My motivation and goal is to explore if we can take this opportunity > to influence the direction of this research to look at what would be > useful to us as a community. ...it does sound like a useful way of kicking off a discussion. Perhaps the survey could be done in advance and then the discussion jump straight on to any differences in evaluation? I do agree that clarity is worth looking at, especially with regard to non-native English speakers. --Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlz1QeYACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AEoAf/fpWUAZQip6b/0IwfRAR76/2mF4+aClIm78iU7nh0qnUJcyvx4xy/WgfC 7nPgGKxAYV6YGUWAwK5kZhZdGwswAOqsJq0x6jL1Ir0pCT7Wy9fKIi8KbXha5684 wRfjFn4rcAh8e4wpssPkiGtqn72xHXGy2FBnEPNmjrUbHeZfSWhq7YOe378KbbpC 1N8busSyztR/pi6k5PdB0D44k3wvT9Ad1aGfUkQbGmnhqXLUZ2oBFbKgKmZYRWzh IrFr3JzqsdTT3K9a9IgmQ5W61TlNSR8h+vStYMcUhEA0TJeE+kSWwBSMoEUaVx6t F1loZoW7rJTegqMJAvu5FsQZ0b6l/A== =3i64 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Avw2VvEbzfULB0h1--