From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C624D33 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 202FFA7 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 08:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 04:27:57 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: "jonsmirl@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20181021082757.GB1617@thunk.org> References: <20181020134908.GA32218@kroah.com> <20181020135118.GG32218@kroah.com> <20181020192845.48b8b860@alans-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, mishi@linux.com, Greg KH , lkml , trondmy@hammerspace.com Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 6/7] Code of Conduct: Change the contact email address List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 03:14:20PM -0400, jonsmirl@gmail.com wrote: > > Which is why the lawyers need to go over this document and I haven't > seen anything posted from them. In the same vein Mauro is concerned > that the way this is code is written it is a binding contract in > Brazil. My understanding is that lawyers from the Linux Foundation have gone over both the CoC and as well as the changes in this patchset, and that this happened before they were sent out. - Ted