From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6F0732D4
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net
	[217.70.183.198])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D545772
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:22:34 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <20181017152234.GB17531@localhost>
References: <20181017071902.30102-1-geert@linux-m68k.org>
	<20181017091325.GA15991@localhost>
	<CAMuHMdX0G767xYYcd8TDMLBp3cY9+fz_aJFAuz8OxgmCmhbNrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1a51fc4c-882c-59ef-7497-262e595af10e@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1a51fc4c-882c-59ef-7497-262e595af10e@roeck-us.net>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, tomi.valkeinen@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] code-of-conduct: Remove explicit list
 of discrimination factors
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 06:32:36AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> One could consider adding something like "discrimination factors such as",
> or maybe "or any other discrimination factors not listed here" to the
> original text. Or a simple "regardless of, for example, ...".

These sound like perfectly reasonable ways to address this. Please
consider submitting a patch upstream based on this reasoning.