From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912C31452 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [172.104.155.198]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10479762 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:43:28 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jan Kara Message-ID: <20180926164328.GW20825@sirena.org.uk> References: <1537830902.4935.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <87k1n8vjef.fsf@intel.com> <20180926091951.GB30730@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lGQpFNrcSq0Rb43w" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180926091951.GB30730@quack2.suse.cz> Cc: olof@lxom.net, James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH-TOPIC] Review - Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --lGQpFNrcSq0Rb43w Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:19:51AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Wed 26-09-18 09:54:00, Jani Nikula wrote: > > This may well be the biggest reason the "code of conlict" did not > > succeed, despite the large number of acks. > One thing I'm missing: Did "code of conflict" really fail? I find the areas > which I follow (filesystems and surroundings) pretty civil but so they were > even before "code of conflict"... So maybe I miss some events? There's a few things there. One is that the name doesn't really convey the idea that this is a particularly serious document, and the content of the document doesn't do a lot of things that are considered good practices for codes of conduct. A big part of the goal with codes of conduct is to send a signal to people outside the community that these issues are taken seriously and that they will get backup if there's a problem and this stuff meant that it didn't really have those effects, people externally didn't take it seriously. --lGQpFNrcSq0Rb43w Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlurty0ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Ar8gf/ewNF0W9HzsbwaJrTvvz5gkv7a48EGTai4EEJE/FnsRmCo9dQ2qgQRcU5 d9QnGJEQ5rbq5JEd8N8SbMv+P4d61dC5Xw2Mnd0PCkmMqg31kJva5xXN1aOb7tcw 2n1ryE65W+6tss6yh+hFHR9y6SZfPDDs18NS2BDf9GkNrr0cEXrgvfsLWYZSaaSa reViJcx0Kw8vjFIiskkAMWE//ajaPYy8cxBe4wm0wwv55nF4lSHb7SvRjarOoogP hh1VcjlEAU/oOdplLET6oUTcWQqA9jM3va3QkDIk9TmHq6b8Xad0KuRBqjyL0d0s PRtz60e1FyIC1QRCqss8nw04/PF++Q== =kz0H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lGQpFNrcSq0Rb43w--