From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
To: <Tim.Bird@sony.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC FOR KS] CoC and Linus position (perhaps undocumented/closed/limited/invite session)
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:52:29 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180920175229.4371ad58@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ECADFF3FD767C149AD96A924E7EA6EAF7C1EBC69@USCULXMSG01.am.sony.com>
Em Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:49:40 +0000
<Tim.Bird@sony.com> escreveu:
> May I suggest that a more productive way to proceed is to keep
> doing what you usually do. The TAB is working out the details
> of enforcement policy, and a FAQ to go along with the CoC, that we
> plan to present at the Maintainers Summit. I think the roll-out of
> CoC enforcement will be a long, slow process, with plenty of
> time for us to hash out what we, as a community, believe are the
> best practices for dealing with violations.
Good to know! I'm looking forward to see it and participate at
the discussions there.
As a side note, IMHO, this would be a way better handled if you had
added the new CoC document with some top note on it explaining about
that, and saying that the roll-out to the new CoC will happen only
after having such FAQ discussed and merged upstream.
> I think the vast majority of
> the kernel community consists of respectful and well-meaning
> individuals, who will see no negative repercussions personally, from
> the adoption of this CoC.
Yeah, fully agreed. The concept of having a CoC and be respectful is good.
The only points I'm not happy is that this particular one doesn't seem to fit
to our development model, as it was conceived with Github in mind.
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-20 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 5:55 Dave Airlie
2018-09-18 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-18 14:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-18 14:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-20 9:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-09-20 9:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-20 10:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-20 15:57 ` Mark Brown
2018-09-18 14:02 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-18 14:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-18 19:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-18 19:36 ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-18 19:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-18 20:52 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-18 21:15 ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-18 23:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-18 23:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-18 19:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-19 11:28 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-19 11:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 12:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-19 16:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 19:55 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 20:10 ` Luck, Tony
2018-09-19 23:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 23:45 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-19 20:23 ` Dave Airlie
2018-09-20 0:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-20 0:22 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-20 6:33 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-20 7:01 ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-20 7:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-20 7:04 ` David Woodhouse
2018-09-24 13:53 ` Mel Gorman
2018-09-25 5:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-09-20 10:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 10:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-20 12:31 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-20 13:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-20 13:49 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-20 13:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 19:14 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-20 19:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 20:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-20 20:14 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-09-20 20:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2018-09-20 2:44 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-20 11:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 13:35 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-20 3:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-20 12:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180920175229.4371ad58@coco.lan \
--to=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox