From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57836CBB for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 20:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03FD784 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 20:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:10:15 -0700 From: "Luck, Tony" To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Message-ID: <20180919201015.GA31523@agluck-desk> References: <1537279328.3424.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180918162948.769dda1d@coco.lan> <1537356482.4640.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180919083749.49268562@coco.lan> <20180919090332.723c1b75@coco.lan> <1537366581.6816.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180919165552.0f30bbef@coco.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180919165552.0f30bbef@coco.lan> Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC FOR KS] CoC and Linus position (perhaps undocumented/closed/limited/invite session) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 04:55:52PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > After re-reading it, I'm pretty sure that, the way it is, publishing > e-mails violate this CoC. > > The thing is that, when it uses the commas there: > > "private information, such as a physical or electronic address," > > The commas actually defines what "private information" is. Even if > this would be changed by "foo information", what we have here is actually two > English sentences that were merged together: > > First sentence: > "Private information, such as a physical or electronic address." > > Second sentence: > "Publishing others’ private information without explicit permission" > > See, replace it by foo at the original text: > "Publishing others’ *foo* information, such as a physical > or electronic address, without explicit permission" > > You'll see that "*foo* information" becomes defined. So perhaps we can move on to discussing a patch to fix it? diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst index ab7c24b5478c..ec99a17ab646 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst @@ -31,10 +31,13 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks * Public or private harassment * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic - address, without explicit permission + address[1], without explicit permission * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting +[1] Note that e-mail addresses used on public mailing lists are not +considered to be private information and can (in fact should) be used +to give credit in Reported-by, Acked-by, Tested-by etc. tags. Our Responsibilities ====================