From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER TOPIC FOR KS] CoC and Linus position (perhaps undocumented/closed/limited/invite session)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:10:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180919201015.GA31523@agluck-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180919165552.0f30bbef@coco.lan>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 04:55:52PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> After re-reading it, I'm pretty sure that, the way it is, publishing
> e-mails violate this CoC.
>
> The thing is that, when it uses the commas there:
>
> "private information, such as a physical or electronic address,"
>
> The commas actually defines what "private information" is. Even if
> this would be changed by "foo information", what we have here is actually two
> English sentences that were merged together:
>
> First sentence:
> "Private information, such as a physical or electronic address."
>
> Second sentence:
> "Publishing others’ private information without explicit permission"
>
> See, replace it by foo at the original text:
> "Publishing others’ *foo* information, such as a physical
> or electronic address, without explicit permission"
>
> You'll see that "*foo* information" becomes defined.
So perhaps we can move on to discussing a patch to fix it?
diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
index ab7c24b5478c..ec99a17ab646 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
@@ -31,10 +31,13 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
* Public or private harassment
* Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
- address, without explicit permission
+ address[1], without explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
professional setting
+[1] Note that e-mail addresses used on public mailing lists are not
+considered to be private information and can (in fact should) be used
+to give credit in Reported-by, Acked-by, Tested-by etc. tags.
Our Responsibilities
====================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-19 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 5:55 Dave Airlie
2018-09-18 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-18 14:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-18 14:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-20 9:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-09-20 9:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-20 10:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-20 15:57 ` Mark Brown
2018-09-18 14:02 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-18 14:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-18 19:29 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-18 19:36 ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-18 19:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-18 20:52 ` Takashi Iwai
2018-09-18 21:15 ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-18 23:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-09-18 23:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-18 19:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-09-19 11:28 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-19 11:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 12:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2018-09-19 16:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 19:55 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 20:10 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2018-09-19 23:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-19 23:45 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-19 20:23 ` Dave Airlie
2018-09-20 0:01 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-20 0:22 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-20 6:33 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-20 7:01 ` Josh Triplett
2018-09-20 7:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-09-20 7:04 ` David Woodhouse
2018-09-24 13:53 ` Mel Gorman
2018-09-25 5:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-09-20 10:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 10:23 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-20 12:31 ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-20 13:04 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-20 13:49 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-20 13:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 19:14 ` Tim.Bird
2018-09-20 19:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 20:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2018-09-20 20:14 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-09-20 20:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-09-20 2:44 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-20 11:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-09-20 13:35 ` Joe Perches
2018-09-20 3:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-20 12:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180919201015.GA31523@agluck-desk \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox