From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9ABE1337 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB0279 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:38:00 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Sasha Levin Message-ID: <20180918193800.GB5400@localhost> References: <20180917115916.37fd5388@coco.lan> <2174637.IVJC5EhCEq@avalon> <20180918160236.GK2471@sirena.org.uk> <86046026ff5a83c48d87c41abaf89bf04ddd71b7.camel@infradead.org> <20180918172450.GS2471@sirena.org.uk> <6bcd4ba815b55f5979475688ed725c43ac3d079f.camel@infradead.org> <20180918193039.GP3821@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180918193039.GP3821@sasha-vm> Cc: "mchehab+samsung@kernel.org" , Tim Bird , ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:30:41PM +0000, Sasha Levin via Ksummit-discuss wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:22:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 10:24 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 05:50:45PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 09:02 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > > At least with Outlook the problem is partly that Outlook's model of how > >> > > e-mail works isn't really able to cope with what we need, it translates > >> > > everything into internal formats in a way that is at best fragile for > >> > > what we need. > >> > Outlook is a pile of crap, but Exchange itself works tolerably these > >> > days. It's fairly simple to send and receive patches through Exchange > >> > if you don't make the mistake of using Outlook. > >> > >> Unfortunately some people do get forced into that :( > > > >Into using Exchange sure... but *Outlook*? > > Yes, an example is when corp policy forces 2FA auth for exachange. I'm > not aware of any non-outlook apps that support that. At that point, I wonder if the best bet would be "don't use that email account for patches".