From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB8412BF for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0103.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.103]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45CEE79 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) From: Sasha Levin To: David Woodhouse Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:30:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20180918193039.GP3821@sasha-vm> References: <20180917115916.37fd5388@coco.lan> <2174637.IVJC5EhCEq@avalon> <20180918160236.GK2471@sirena.org.uk> <86046026ff5a83c48d87c41abaf89bf04ddd71b7.camel@infradead.org> <20180918172450.GS2471@sirena.org.uk> <6bcd4ba815b55f5979475688ed725c43ac3d079f.camel@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <6bcd4ba815b55f5979475688ed725c43ac3d079f.camel@infradead.org> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <34545B14315B1A409977C91F24B82948@namprd21.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "mchehab+samsung@kernel.org" , Tim Bird , ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:22:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 10:24 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 05:50:45PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> > On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 09:02 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: >> > > At least with Outlook the problem is partly that Outlook's model of = how >> > > e-mail works isn't really able to cope with what we need, it transla= tes >> > > everything into internal formats in a way that is at best fragile fo= r >> > > what we need. >> > Outlook is a pile of crap, but Exchange itself works tolerably these >> > days. It's fairly simple to send and receive patches through Exchange >> > if you don't make the mistake of using Outlook. >> >> Unfortunately some people do get forced into that :( > >Into using Exchange sure... but *Outlook*? Yes, an example is when corp policy forces 2FA auth for exachange. I'm not aware of any non-outlook apps that support that. -- Thanks, Sasha=