From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C92211B0 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk (heliosphere.sirena.org.uk [172.104.155.198]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6658D for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:56:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:56:34 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: James Bottomley Message-ID: <20180911175634.GF10123@sirena.org.uk> References: <20180907014930.GE16300@sasha-vm> <20180907145437.GF16300@sasha-vm> <20180910194310.GV16300@sasha-vm> <20180910164519.6cbcc116@vmware.local.home> <20180910212019.GA32269@roeck-us.net> <20180911111853.GB8018@sirena.org.uk> <20180911170212.GC8284@roeck-us.net> <1536686530.3511.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1536686530.3511.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Bug-introducing patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:22:10AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > Not to excuse rudeness, we always try to be polite on lists when this > happens, but -next builds on Australian time, so when we find and fix > an issue there can be up to 24h before it propagates. In that time, > particularly if it's a stupid bug, it gets picked up and flagged by a > number of self contained 0day type projects and possibly a couple of > coccinelle type ones as well. It does get a bit repetitive for > maintainers to receive and have to respond to 4 or 5 bug reports for > something they just fixed ... I'd have thought most maintainers would be pretty used to sending repetitive e-mail by now :) > Perhaps the -next tracking projects could have some sort of co- > ordination list to prevent the five bug reports for the same issue > problem? We're not *that* overburdened with people running testing, and especially not with people actively reporting the results, at the minute. A lot of the testers do have different focuses too which reduces overlap quite a bit. When I've seen this happening it's more been collisions with people testing a specific platform for their own use duplicating things. There is kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org but it's very much a firehose right now, really this would want a bug tracker. --NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAluYAdEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DqpQf7BAtgh/f01DB8+RR9q88D0O5XEyDFrW4yx08RLD1WqWGA2xupiSlH2LFW ulxgyRlgO0ypMSzzJ2Ad4ccxTdfeqyhh4dcQH/NpnEQTjf9SpU7PpSe4nSRXFxcs Pt2wrGZTX/dLSlzziL7LLP0N8XiW7IbdD1IBo5CstO+sRaPTB9v+DUVC9XVCt1Ez 0PgFXWWIQQW/1tUpZiwuVy63o7W5OtGHpoO7TJArcEjWh0H3Yoy9eWleyHRMfwsC 9jhrDsxFiOWhoTODBWuA+BSPOG4pZAQbiYk175TPUnyf5wuKyA0KtTjMz3DaUNga Q6RTPMbHqaWHL/mf5dAB0NmBnZ82dg== =4KNV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NGIwU0kFl1Z1A3An--