From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E92F3F39 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0617DD for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:47:07 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Steven Rostedt Message-ID: <20180911104707.65613222@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20180910174638.26fff182@vmware.local.home> References: <20180905101710.73137669@gandalf.local.home> <20180907004944.GD16300@sasha-vm> <20180907014930.GE16300@sasha-vm> <20180907145437.GF16300@sasha-vm> <20180910194310.GV16300@sasha-vm> <20180910164519.6cbcc116@vmware.local.home> <20180910212019.GA32269@roeck-us.net> <20180910174638.26fff182@vmware.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/7LFIdfvfLvZ1fHwjo+DvU32"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Bug-introducing patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Sig_/7LFIdfvfLvZ1fHwjo+DvU32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steve, On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:46:38 -0400 Steven Rostedt wro= te: > > Honestly, I think this is something that Linus should yell at > maintainers for. I treat my pushes into linux-next the same as I treat > my pull requests to Linus. I don't push anything into next until it's > been fully run through my test suite, and passes. That also makes it > easier for me to know that whatever I have in next is also ready for > Linus (the way it was suppose to be). I am pretty sure that Linus does not follow linux-next (except to see what is still coming during the merge window), so maybe I should be yelling at people - but yelling is not one of my better skills :-) In the current particular case it is runtime testing that is failing and I only do a small amount of that (and it is not failing for me). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/7LFIdfvfLvZ1fHwjo+DvU32 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAluXEIsACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxhUAf/Z7gYN4YGi60m//WgX8XLmBm/+vHRsahJtSXBmJ3vvaIvUcKGWtKByupl y3hTcY10qNi2OPQf+cP0rwcBkuVtx2lSiBOaDW3n7JtwWn8r3rK4Rv+hbuIj0ELd +0n9WqWbxoD2kYIp/3JC/+USOrnt/8SkU2+g3g60JT4dcQvBStEHtEQmYN2gW0SS Lwx+rCYrpFGGDoyvBJP+WHb/suhsu3BoQBGXnP65gW43rzcdlUkMKux3jMtS97UP O7S7hamqCtcje96SMrNt6XS2kn64/4hfDjXVaoa85EgdHaqMWLMee6zM5GGOrTZR b0ItnY19XvXS9OgWHNB/bHz05ZJmYg== =d6yJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7LFIdfvfLvZ1fHwjo+DvU32--