From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:48:07 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <20180911084807.GC23570@kroah.com> References: <20180908082141.15d72684@coco.lan> <20180908113411.GA3111@kroah.com> <1536418829.22308.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180908153235.GB11120@kroah.com> <1536422066.22308.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: James Bottomley , mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Handling of embargoed security issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:59:26PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > I *do* wish that companies like Intel who are actively doing these > non-NDA things would find some way to share their methods. Maybe the LF > can help here by providing a semi-anonymous way for folks to share what > has worked. Or, maybe folks like Intel need to just to it ourselves. There is a framework where Intel can share these types of methods already. The LF has at least one meeting a year for all of the Linux-related company's legal people to come together and share information and talk in a way that all can benefit, using the Chatham House rules. I'm sure a presentation from Intel to that group would always be most welcome. thanks, greg k-h