From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B03E1E21 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBBD471C for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id h3-v6so30146750ita.2 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:47:38 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Sasha Levin Message-ID: <20180910154738.GA3712@chatter> References: <1536592110.4035.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20180910153806.GR16300@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180910153806.GR16300@sasha-vm> Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] community management/subsystem governance List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:38:07PM +0000, Sasha Levin via Ksummit-discuss wrote: >Yes, some maintainers started adding links to lkml archives, but those >are very inconsistent and often just point to the patch submission >rather than relevant discussions. > >I'm not sure what's a good way to solve this, but I'd really like to >stop losing this valuable information as a result of the current >process. This is partly the goal behind cregit: https://cregit.linuxsources.org/ The plan is that the next version of cregit will become an official kernel.org resource some time mid-next year, and will aggregate as much information about the kernel code as it can from various places, including patchwork. -K